— read write play

A post for students currently taking Devising for the Stage in Spring 09. Here are your instructions:

1. Take a look at the photograph in this entry (you can click to load a larger version).

2. Write the FIRST SENTENCE of a story inspired by this image: one sentence, and one sentence alone. Leave the sentence as a comment on this entry.

3. Write the LAST SENTENCE of someone else’s story by picking a comment and clicking “reply to this comment.” You can reply to a comment which already has a first sentence (i.e. a story can have more than one ending).

You may need to revisit the site later after posting your own first sentence to allow other story fragments/comments to arrive.

In talking about the influences on the performance project I’m embarking on (slides here – pdf) I picked out one particular problem. How do I (and audiences) process the kind of scale involved in the current financial crisis? How much is a trillion, anyway?

Various newspapers have tried recently – with varying degrees of success – to describe economies of scale. An article in The Guardian helpfully calculated that a stack of one trillion pound coins would reach from the surface of the earth to Mars. The problem there, though, is that I have no real comprehension of the distance to Mars. One abstract quantity has been replaced by another equally abstract image.

One approach I’m testing involves creating an audience-specific exchange rate: count up all the money in the room, in cash and credit card limits, and then use that as the base unit for discussion. How many rooms of ready cash would make up a million? How many for a trillion?

There’s still, I think, a problem of scale – that the jump from million to trillion requires such a shift of perception that our imaginations might still fail us. A thousand rooms of people isn’t necessarily more comprehendable than the tower of money to Mars.

However, building a relationship of value based on the money or spending power we (perhaps unthinkingly) carry around with us on a daily basis could be the first step in a journey of understanding. Instead of reaching directly for the trillion, we could make a sequence of manageable leaps: from cash in hand, to yearly income, to the cost of a house and on upwards.

My main reason for talking about the trouble with trillions, this morning and now, is to ask for help. What does a trillion mean to you?

On the train heading to Newtown for our departmental research conference, looking over the talk I’m giving tomorrow morning. The talk is an attempt to describe the ongoing process of bringing together my research (primarily written, formal, theory-led) with my performance practice (improvised, disposable, pragmatic, comic). More than anything, I want to talk about my growing engagement (a polite way of saying obsession) with interactive, co-operative and collaborative performance.

Accordingly, my struggle over what to say is coupled – painfully – with the question of how to say it. I’m on a panel with two colleagues: it’s not the time or space for a 20 minute work-in-progress performance (even if I had 20 minutes to show, which I really don’t).

My solution – and I’ll soon find out if it works – is to use my presentation to play a game with the audience, a gamble when the game is brand new (to me and everyone else) and the game doesn’t have a “winning” state which might provide satisfying closure. Instead, I’m presuming (gambling/hoping) that the best way to talk about process is to actually engage in it – to play a performance game, rather than describing the rules or showing what you could have already won.

So. Wish me luck.